5 Things Enterprise Architects Are Doing Wrong—And What They Should Do About It

The Challenge for Enterprise Architects

Enterprise Architecture (EA) is at a crossroads. While EA leaders have long been positioned as key enablers of digital transformation, the rapidly shifting business landscape of 2025 presents new pressures. Economic uncertainty, geopolitical instability, and the explosion of AI-driven initiatives mean that enterprise architects must redefine their roles to remain relevant and valuable.

Unfortunately, many EA teams are failing to evolve fast enough. According to Gartner’s 2025 Leadership Vision for Enterprise Architecture, several key missteps are preventing EA from delivering the business impact it should. Here’s what EA professionals are getting wrong—and how to fix it.

Mistake #1: EA Operating Models Are Stuck in the Past

The Problem: Many EA teams still operate within traditional, centralized models that do not align with today’s distributed and democratized decision-making processes. Organizations have increasingly moved toward agile, product-oriented structures, where technology decisions are made within individual business units rather than dictated from a top-down IT function.

This decentralization is necessary to drive innovation and responsiveness, but EA teams have struggled to redefine their role in this new landscape. Instead of acting as rigid gatekeepers, they must transition into strategic enablers.

The Solution: Enterprise architects must redesign their operating models to support federated decision-making. This means:

  • Balancing global and local delivery – providing enterprise-wide oversight while empowering domain-specific decision-making.
  • Offering EA as a service – positioning architecture as a consultative function that provides value to product and business teams.
  • Shifting from control to collaboration – influencing architectural decisions through education, tools, and enablement rather than rigid governance.

By embracing these shifts, EA can integrate more seamlessly into agile delivery models and ensure its insights remain relevant.

Mistake #2: Ignoring the Need to Modernize Technology Portfolios

The Problem: Despite years of digital transformation efforts, many organizations still struggle with technical debt, bloated application portfolios, and monolithic architectures that slow down innovation.

Business leaders expect technology to drive profitable growth and efficiency, but fragmented, outdated systems stand in the way. EA teams, however, often lack the influence or strategic alignment to drive meaningful modernization efforts.

Business architecture is an essential input for modernizing the technology portfolio. Yet, business executives often mistake and perceive modernization as a purely technical issue and misunderstand the need of their involvement through a business architecture lens and perspective.

The Solution: EA teams must take the lead in modernizing the IT landscape by:

  • Driving application rationalization – clear, structured plans to continualling eliminate redundant systems and consolidate tech stacks to improve agility.
  • Enabling cloud adoption and composable architectures – creating a more flexible and scalable foundation for digital transformation, and the ability to respond faster to changing environments.
  • Facilitating a business-driven approach to modernization – ensuring that technology investments align with business objectives rather than just IT priorities.

A structured approach to modernization will help EA teams shift from being perceived as bureaucratic roadblocks to indispensable strategic partners.

Mistake #3: Lack of Financial Acumen

The Problem: CEOs and CFOs are increasingly focused on maximizing ROI from digital investments. Yet, many EA teams lack the financial modeling skills necessary to justify their recommendations in terms of business value.

Without a clear ability to communicate cost-benefit analysis, ROI calculations, and investment trade-offs, EA teams struggle to articulate why certain technology decisions should be prioritized. This weakens their ability to influence decision-making at the highest levels.

The Solution: Enterprise architects can increase credibility in the organization by workingmore closely with finance teams and developing financial modeling and analysis competencies, including:

  • Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and capital budgeting – ensuring that architectural decisions are financially sound.
  • Cost-benefit and trade-off analysis – evaluating alternative technology strategies based on business impact.
  • Financial forecasting for technology investments – helping organizations prioritize IT spending in a way that maximizes growth and efficiency.

By speaking the language of finance, EA leaders can better align their work with executive priorities and demonstrate tangible business value.

Mistake #4: Falling Behind in AI Strategy

The Problem: Technology-driven growth, and AI in particular, is dominating the strategic agenda for CEOs in 2025. However, many EA teams are perceived by executives to lack the necessary expertise in AI technologies, data architectures, and ethical considerations to effectively guide AI-driven initiatives.

As a result, EA is often sidelined in AI strategy discussions, limiting its ability to shape long-term technology decisions.

The Solution: Enterprise architects must quickly upskill in AI by:

  • Knowledge and skills: study, mentoring, coaching, communities, experimentation
  • Understanding AI-driven business use cases – identifying where AI can create competitive advantage (Gartner recommends reading the Gartner research! 😁)
  • Building AI-ready data foundations – ensuring organizations have the right data and infrastructure for AI deployment.
  • Navigating AI ethics and governance – establishing frameworks for responsible AI usage.

By becoming AI-literate, EA leaders can regain executive trust and help organizations make smarter AI investments.

Mistake #5: Failing to Reinvent EA’s Value Proposition

The Problem: Many EA teams still struggle to clearly articulate their value to business stakeholders. Without a well-defined EA value proposition, architecture functions risk being viewed as an unnecessary bureaucratic layer rather than a critical enabler of business success.

The Solution: Enterprise architects must continuously refine and communicate their value proposition by:

  • Aligning EA services with business priorities – focusing on delivering tangible outcomes rather than theoretical frameworks.
  • Delivering value early and often – adopting agile principles to demonstrate impact incrementally.
  • Proactively engaging stakeholders – ensuring that business leaders understand and support EA’s role in driving transformation.

Ultimately, EA’s survival in 2025 depends on its ability to reposition itself as a business-driven function rather than a technology governance team.

The Path Forward for Enterprise Architects

The world of enterprise architecture is evolving rapidly. To stay relevant in 2025, EA teams must break free from outdated operating models, drive meaningful technology modernization, develop financial and AI expertise, and continuously refine their value proposition.

Those who make these changes will not only secure their place at the strategic decision-making table but also become indispensable partners in shaping their organizations’ future.

Interested in discussing further, and developing your skills? Join us for the Next Generation SAP Enterprise Architect Learning Forum in Newtown Square, February 24-27!


Posted

in

,

by

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *